Making Your First Chapter 13 Payment
In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case the debtor proposes a plan to pay back creditors. That plan is composed of monthly payments to satisfy all or part of the creditors' claims over three to five years. Monthly payments are made to the Chapter 13 Trustee, who then pays your creditors.
There is often confusion over when the first plan payment due. Section 1326 of the Bankruptcy Code directs that the first payment must be made within 30 days after filing the bankruptcy case, even if the debtor’s bankruptcy plan has not yet been approved by the court. Often the first meeting with the Trustee (also known as the "341 meeting" or "meeting of creditors") is scheduled more than 30 days after the filing date, so the Trustee expects your first payment before that meeting. The Trustee will hold all payments until the plan is approved by the Bankruptcy Court (called "confirmation"), and then make distributions to creditors.
It is critical that you make this initial payment within thirty days after filing. It is especially important to monitor the status of this first payment when you have instructed your employer to pay the Trustee from your wages. It is your responsibility to ensure that this first payment is made, and neither the Trustee nor the Bankruptcy Court gives much latitude to a debtor who misses the first deadline in the case.
Making a timely first Chapter 13 payment allows your plan to proceed to confirmation and will expedite the bankruptcy process. Failure to commence making payments can result in delays, additional expenses, or even dismissal. Consult with your bankruptcy attorney regarding payment details, and make that first payment on-time!
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Bankruptcy Cases Per Capita
Bankruptcy Cases Per Capita
Nevada, Tennessee, and Georgia are the highest per capita states for bankruptcy filings according recently released data concerning the first quarter of 2010. Records from the Automated Access to Court Electronic Records show there were 378,990 total bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2010, up from 325,815 in the first quarter of 2009.
In Nevada residents filed 10.3 bankruptcies per 1,000 residents for the first quarter of 2010. Tennessee and Georgia filed 8.0 and 7.8 respectively. Alaska is the state with the lowest per capita filing with 1.5 filings per 1,000 residents. According to these statistics the average Nevadan is almost seven times more likely to file bankruptcy than the average Alaskan.
Below is a list of the state’s bankruptcy filings per capita:
1. Nevada 10.3
2. Tennessee 8.0
3. Georgia 7.8
4. Michigan 7.4
5. Alabama 7.1
6. Indiana 7.0
7. California 6.4
8. Illinois 6.4
9. Kentucky 6.1
10. Ohio 5.9
11. Colorado 5.9
12. Utah 5.8
13. Arizona 5.6
14. Arkansas 5.6
15. Florida 5.6
16. Wisconsin 5.3
17. Rhode Island 5.2
18. Missouri 5.1
19. Delaware 5.1
20. Mississippi 5.0
21. Maryland 5.0
22. Washington 4.9
23. Oregon 4.8
24. Virginia 4.7
25. New Jersey 4.5
26. New Hampshire 4.5
27. Idaho 4.4
28. Nebraska 4.3
29. Minnesota 4.2
30. Louisiana 3.9
31. Oklahoma 3.8
32. West Virginia 3.7
33. Kansas 3.6
34. Massachusetts 3.5
35. New Mexico 3.3
36. Iowa 3.3
37. Connecticut 3.2
38. Pennsylvania 3.0
39. Maine 2.9
40. Vermont 2.9
41. Hawaii 2.9
42. North Carolina 2.8
43. Montana 2.7
44. New York 2.7
45. Wyoming 2.5
46. Texas 2.2
47. South Dakota 2.2
48. North Dakota 2.2
49. District of Columbia 2.1
50. South Carolina 2.1
51. Alaska 1.5
If you are considering a personal bankruptcy, you are not alone! In this tough economy, many families file bankruptcy to relieve them from the pressures of overwhelming debt and to begin their fresh start to a brighter financial future. Have your case evaluated today from an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you.
Nevada, Tennessee, and Georgia are the highest per capita states for bankruptcy filings according recently released data concerning the first quarter of 2010. Records from the Automated Access to Court Electronic Records show there were 378,990 total bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2010, up from 325,815 in the first quarter of 2009.
In Nevada residents filed 10.3 bankruptcies per 1,000 residents for the first quarter of 2010. Tennessee and Georgia filed 8.0 and 7.8 respectively. Alaska is the state with the lowest per capita filing with 1.5 filings per 1,000 residents. According to these statistics the average Nevadan is almost seven times more likely to file bankruptcy than the average Alaskan.
Below is a list of the state’s bankruptcy filings per capita:
1. Nevada 10.3
2. Tennessee 8.0
3. Georgia 7.8
4. Michigan 7.4
5. Alabama 7.1
6. Indiana 7.0
7. California 6.4
8. Illinois 6.4
9. Kentucky 6.1
10. Ohio 5.9
11. Colorado 5.9
12. Utah 5.8
13. Arizona 5.6
14. Arkansas 5.6
15. Florida 5.6
16. Wisconsin 5.3
17. Rhode Island 5.2
18. Missouri 5.1
19. Delaware 5.1
20. Mississippi 5.0
21. Maryland 5.0
22. Washington 4.9
23. Oregon 4.8
24. Virginia 4.7
25. New Jersey 4.5
26. New Hampshire 4.5
27. Idaho 4.4
28. Nebraska 4.3
29. Minnesota 4.2
30. Louisiana 3.9
31. Oklahoma 3.8
32. West Virginia 3.7
33. Kansas 3.6
34. Massachusetts 3.5
35. New Mexico 3.3
36. Iowa 3.3
37. Connecticut 3.2
38. Pennsylvania 3.0
39. Maine 2.9
40. Vermont 2.9
41. Hawaii 2.9
42. North Carolina 2.8
43. Montana 2.7
44. New York 2.7
45. Wyoming 2.5
46. Texas 2.2
47. South Dakota 2.2
48. North Dakota 2.2
49. District of Columbia 2.1
50. South Carolina 2.1
51. Alaska 1.5
If you are considering a personal bankruptcy, you are not alone! In this tough economy, many families file bankruptcy to relieve them from the pressures of overwhelming debt and to begin their fresh start to a brighter financial future. Have your case evaluated today from an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you.
Credit Card Defendant Wins Lawsuit, Collects $120,000
Credit Card Defendant Wins Lawsuit, Collects $120,000
Most of the debt collection industry is based on bully tactics. Each stage of the collection process is designed to intimidate and harass until the individual simply surrenders and pays the debt. Collectors send embarrassing letters in pink envelopes marked “URGENT!” or “IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED!” They make scores of phone calls at home and work, until you are afraid to pick up your own phone.
Even when there is a valid defense, a credit card company will sometimes seek to bury the defendant with the enormity of its size. Take for example the recent Palm Beach County, Florida, case of Capital One Bank USA, NA v Pincus. Capital One sued Steven Pincus for a credit card debt of $803.95. Pincus offered to settle the debt for a few hundred dollars, and Capital One refused. Pincus then hired an attorney to defend. Capital One responded with a barrage of court filings that ran up Pincus’s legal expense tab to over $100,000.
Pincus moved for summary judgment and dismissal claiming the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations. Pincus asserted that the Capital One cardholder agreement states that Virginia law shall control, and, since the contract was not signed by either party, whatever agreement existed between Pincus and Capital One must be an oral contract. Pincus further argued that since the statute of limitations for oral contracts in Virginia is three years and since Capital One’s lawsuit was filed three and a half years after the date of the last transaction, Capital One’s case is time barred. Capital One defended by arguing that Florida law and its five year statute of limitations should control because Florida was the state where the contract was made.
The Palm Beach County Court found that Virginia law controlled and the credit card agreement was an oral contract based on Virginia law. The opinion cited several similar Florida cases finding the choice of law provision in a cardholder agreement applies to a statute of limitations defense. In granting Pincus’s summary judgment motion and dismissing the case, the Florida court opinion said the credit card company is “‘master of its complaint’ and cannot disavow the choice of law provision contained in the document it attaches to its Complaint so it can take advantage of the longer statute of limitations.”
The Pincus case did not end there. Pincus and his attorney filed a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit in federal court against Capital One’s attorneys to recover his attorney fees (Capital One, as an original creditor, is exempt from the FDCPA, but collection attorneys are not). The case was settled after contentious litigation for $120,000.
The moral of the story is “Don’t be bullied!” If you are sued for a credit card debt, seek legal advice from an experienced debt defense attorney. Many bankruptcy attorneys are experts in debt defense and can explain your legal options.
Most of the debt collection industry is based on bully tactics. Each stage of the collection process is designed to intimidate and harass until the individual simply surrenders and pays the debt. Collectors send embarrassing letters in pink envelopes marked “URGENT!” or “IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED!” They make scores of phone calls at home and work, until you are afraid to pick up your own phone.
Even when there is a valid defense, a credit card company will sometimes seek to bury the defendant with the enormity of its size. Take for example the recent Palm Beach County, Florida, case of Capital One Bank USA, NA v Pincus. Capital One sued Steven Pincus for a credit card debt of $803.95. Pincus offered to settle the debt for a few hundred dollars, and Capital One refused. Pincus then hired an attorney to defend. Capital One responded with a barrage of court filings that ran up Pincus’s legal expense tab to over $100,000.
Pincus moved for summary judgment and dismissal claiming the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations. Pincus asserted that the Capital One cardholder agreement states that Virginia law shall control, and, since the contract was not signed by either party, whatever agreement existed between Pincus and Capital One must be an oral contract. Pincus further argued that since the statute of limitations for oral contracts in Virginia is three years and since Capital One’s lawsuit was filed three and a half years after the date of the last transaction, Capital One’s case is time barred. Capital One defended by arguing that Florida law and its five year statute of limitations should control because Florida was the state where the contract was made.
The Palm Beach County Court found that Virginia law controlled and the credit card agreement was an oral contract based on Virginia law. The opinion cited several similar Florida cases finding the choice of law provision in a cardholder agreement applies to a statute of limitations defense. In granting Pincus’s summary judgment motion and dismissing the case, the Florida court opinion said the credit card company is “‘master of its complaint’ and cannot disavow the choice of law provision contained in the document it attaches to its Complaint so it can take advantage of the longer statute of limitations.”
The Pincus case did not end there. Pincus and his attorney filed a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit in federal court against Capital One’s attorneys to recover his attorney fees (Capital One, as an original creditor, is exempt from the FDCPA, but collection attorneys are not). The case was settled after contentious litigation for $120,000.
The moral of the story is “Don’t be bullied!” If you are sued for a credit card debt, seek legal advice from an experienced debt defense attorney. Many bankruptcy attorneys are experts in debt defense and can explain your legal options.
Can I Keep My House If I File Bankruptcy
Can I Keep My House If I File Bankruptcy
One of the most common and important questions asked by a client during the initial bankruptcy consultation is, “Can I keep my house?”
The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experienced attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.
The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.
The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.
In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.
Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.
There are many options available for saving your home. Your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.
One of the most common and important questions asked by a client during the initial bankruptcy consultation is, “Can I keep my house?”
The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experienced attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.
The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.
The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.
In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.
Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.
There are many options available for saving your home. Your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.
Discharged Creditor Responsible for Selling Debt
Discharged Creditor Responsible for Selling Debt
A bankruptcy discharge is a permanent court injunction prohibiting creditors from enforcing certain obligations against the debtor. While the bankruptcy discharge does not actually “erase” a debt, it prohibits any collection against the debtor personally. In plain terms, the debt is no longer legally enforceable against the debtor and the creditor can no longer engage in any type of collection activity such as; letters, phone calls, threats of criminal proceedings or other adverse actions brought about with the purpose of debt repayment.
The purpose of the discharge injunction is to provide the debtor with a fresh financial start, free of the pressures of former debt. Violation of the bankruptcy discharge is a serious matter. A willful violation of the discharge injunction constitutes contempt of court. The violator (often called the “contemnor”) may be penalized for this conduct, including a hefty fine and payment of attorney fees.
Recently United States Bankruptcy Court Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte discussed the liability of a creditor that sold a discharged debt and the subsequent purchaser attempted collection action. This is practice is often referred to as “zombie” debt collection. The debt is legally “dead,” and the collector attempts to “bring it back to life” through direct collection efforts.
In the case of Laboy v. FirstBank Puerto Rico, Judge Lomoutte reminds creditors that they "are obligated to maintain procedures to ensure that they do not violate [the discharge injunction], and may be held liable for damages and attorney's fees if they do not.” He concluded that FirstBank had knowledge of the bankruptcy filing and discharge and that its actions in selling the debt to a debt collector some 15 years after the bankruptcy discharge violated the discharge injunction.
If you receive contact from a debt collector concerning a discharged debt, notify your bankruptcy attorney immediately. This may be an innocent error, or it may be a zombie debt collector on the prowl. Either way, you should contact your bankruptcy attorney and chase these zombies debts back to the grave!
A bankruptcy discharge is a permanent court injunction prohibiting creditors from enforcing certain obligations against the debtor. While the bankruptcy discharge does not actually “erase” a debt, it prohibits any collection against the debtor personally. In plain terms, the debt is no longer legally enforceable against the debtor and the creditor can no longer engage in any type of collection activity such as; letters, phone calls, threats of criminal proceedings or other adverse actions brought about with the purpose of debt repayment.
The purpose of the discharge injunction is to provide the debtor with a fresh financial start, free of the pressures of former debt. Violation of the bankruptcy discharge is a serious matter. A willful violation of the discharge injunction constitutes contempt of court. The violator (often called the “contemnor”) may be penalized for this conduct, including a hefty fine and payment of attorney fees.
Recently United States Bankruptcy Court Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte discussed the liability of a creditor that sold a discharged debt and the subsequent purchaser attempted collection action. This is practice is often referred to as “zombie” debt collection. The debt is legally “dead,” and the collector attempts to “bring it back to life” through direct collection efforts.
In the case of Laboy v. FirstBank Puerto Rico, Judge Lomoutte reminds creditors that they "are obligated to maintain procedures to ensure that they do not violate [the discharge injunction], and may be held liable for damages and attorney's fees if they do not.” He concluded that FirstBank had knowledge of the bankruptcy filing and discharge and that its actions in selling the debt to a debt collector some 15 years after the bankruptcy discharge violated the discharge injunction.
If you receive contact from a debt collector concerning a discharged debt, notify your bankruptcy attorney immediately. This may be an innocent error, or it may be a zombie debt collector on the prowl. Either way, you should contact your bankruptcy attorney and chase these zombies debts back to the grave!
Monday, May 24, 2010
Discharging Bank Account Debt During Bankruptcy
Discharging Bank Account Debt During Bankruptcy
A bank account debt can offer many challenges to an individual in bankruptcy. Usually a bank account debt originates from fees associated with an overdrawn account. These fees can quickly accumulate and result in a debt of hundreds of dollars. A bankruptcy will generally discharge this debt, assuming the debt was not incurred by fraud or criminal activity. However, the issue is often should you discharge your bank account debt rather than can it be discharged.
In deciding whether to discharge a bank account debt, you must determine if repayment is feasible. In cases where the debt is small, the account is still open, and you have the resources to pay the debt, repaying the debt is generally the best option. Remember to consult with your attorney before repaying any debt prior to filing bankruptcy. In many cases it is advantageous to wait until after the case is filed before repaying a debt.
If paying the bank account debt is not feasible, you may face several negative consequences. First, the bank will close your bank account. Second, over eighty percent of all banks use Chexsystems, a consumer reporting agency that provides information regarding accounts at banking institutions. Negative information may remain on your Chexsystems file for five years. To view your Chexsystems report for free, visit: https://www.consumerdebit.com/consumerinfo/us/en/chexsystems/report/index.htm
While a bankruptcy will discharge a bank account debt, factual information concerning the debt will remain on your Chexsystems report after the bankruptcy. This information is available to financial institutions and may prevent you from opening another bank account.
Fortunately, there are programs available to an individual with a derogatory Chexsystems report offered by banks, universities, and not for profit groups. One of the most popular is the “Get Checking” program offered by several groups around the country. The University of Missouri Extension offers a typical “Get Checking” program, which requires a debtor to pay all outstanding bank fees on the prior bank account and take a six-hour checking education class. The debtor then receives a certificate of completion which can be used to open a new account at a participating financial institution. If ChexSystems reports suspicion of fraud on a prior account, a certificate will not be issued and institutions are not required to open an account.
If you have an overdrawn bank account and are considering bankruptcy, discuss your financial situation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. There are many options to deal with bank account debt, but the situation can only grow worse from procrastination. Quick action is the best cure for this type of debt.
A bank account debt can offer many challenges to an individual in bankruptcy. Usually a bank account debt originates from fees associated with an overdrawn account. These fees can quickly accumulate and result in a debt of hundreds of dollars. A bankruptcy will generally discharge this debt, assuming the debt was not incurred by fraud or criminal activity. However, the issue is often should you discharge your bank account debt rather than can it be discharged.
In deciding whether to discharge a bank account debt, you must determine if repayment is feasible. In cases where the debt is small, the account is still open, and you have the resources to pay the debt, repaying the debt is generally the best option. Remember to consult with your attorney before repaying any debt prior to filing bankruptcy. In many cases it is advantageous to wait until after the case is filed before repaying a debt.
If paying the bank account debt is not feasible, you may face several negative consequences. First, the bank will close your bank account. Second, over eighty percent of all banks use Chexsystems, a consumer reporting agency that provides information regarding accounts at banking institutions. Negative information may remain on your Chexsystems file for five years. To view your Chexsystems report for free, visit: https://www.consumerdebit.com/consumerinfo/us/en/chexsystems/report/index.htm
While a bankruptcy will discharge a bank account debt, factual information concerning the debt will remain on your Chexsystems report after the bankruptcy. This information is available to financial institutions and may prevent you from opening another bank account.
Fortunately, there are programs available to an individual with a derogatory Chexsystems report offered by banks, universities, and not for profit groups. One of the most popular is the “Get Checking” program offered by several groups around the country. The University of Missouri Extension offers a typical “Get Checking” program, which requires a debtor to pay all outstanding bank fees on the prior bank account and take a six-hour checking education class. The debtor then receives a certificate of completion which can be used to open a new account at a participating financial institution. If ChexSystems reports suspicion of fraud on a prior account, a certificate will not be issued and institutions are not required to open an account.
If you have an overdrawn bank account and are considering bankruptcy, discuss your financial situation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. There are many options to deal with bank account debt, but the situation can only grow worse from procrastination. Quick action is the best cure for this type of debt.
When Judgment Proof Is Not Poor Enough
When Judgment Proof Is Not Poor Enough
In some cases a debtor has no money, no job, and no assets. Lawyers commonly refer to this situation as being “judgment proof.” Any attempts to collect on a debt will be futile. As the saying goes, “You can’t get blood out of a turnip.”
While an entirely insolvent and judgment proof individual may avoid creditor collection, many people without money, jobs, or assets receive periodic federal benefits like Social Security. The federal law prohibits most creditors from garnishing federal benefits making the individual “legally” judgment proof.
Debt collectors will occasionally circumvent the federal prohibition by seizing the debtor’s bank account through a state court order. After a judge orders the seizure of a bank account to satisfy a judgment it is the debtor’s obligation to prove that the funds are federally protected. This generally requires hiring an attorney and holding a hearing in the state court. For more information, visit the Federal Trade Commission website for a free publication about bank account seizure of federal benefits.
To close this legal loophole, the Obama administration has recently proposed rules to protect federal benefits from creditor garnishment. These proposed rules require banks to determine whether federal benefits have been directly deposited into a customer’s account within the past 60 days, and to determine the amount, before collecting funds pursuant to a court order. More than 80 percent of Social Security recipients receive their monthly benefits via direct deposit.
Many federal benefits are protected during bankruptcy. For a legally judgment proof debtor, a bankruptcy will end creditor harassment, prevent a bank account seizure, Stop foreclosure, Stop Garnishments, and discharge the debt for good. A bankruptcy can provide peace of mind.
If you receive federal benefits and have outstanding debts, consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can advise you on the best course of action to resolve the debt and protect your federal benefits.
In some cases a debtor has no money, no job, and no assets. Lawyers commonly refer to this situation as being “judgment proof.” Any attempts to collect on a debt will be futile. As the saying goes, “You can’t get blood out of a turnip.”
While an entirely insolvent and judgment proof individual may avoid creditor collection, many people without money, jobs, or assets receive periodic federal benefits like Social Security. The federal law prohibits most creditors from garnishing federal benefits making the individual “legally” judgment proof.
Debt collectors will occasionally circumvent the federal prohibition by seizing the debtor’s bank account through a state court order. After a judge orders the seizure of a bank account to satisfy a judgment it is the debtor’s obligation to prove that the funds are federally protected. This generally requires hiring an attorney and holding a hearing in the state court. For more information, visit the Federal Trade Commission website for a free publication about bank account seizure of federal benefits.
To close this legal loophole, the Obama administration has recently proposed rules to protect federal benefits from creditor garnishment. These proposed rules require banks to determine whether federal benefits have been directly deposited into a customer’s account within the past 60 days, and to determine the amount, before collecting funds pursuant to a court order. More than 80 percent of Social Security recipients receive their monthly benefits via direct deposit.
Many federal benefits are protected during bankruptcy. For a legally judgment proof debtor, a bankruptcy will end creditor harassment, prevent a bank account seizure, Stop foreclosure, Stop Garnishments, and discharge the debt for good. A bankruptcy can provide peace of mind.
If you receive federal benefits and have outstanding debts, consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can advise you on the best course of action to resolve the debt and protect your federal benefits.
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Bankruptcy Means Test
Bankruptcy Means Test
The bankruptcy means test is a calculation designed to identify debtors who can afford to pay some of their unsecured debts (for instance, credit card debt) and encourage repayment of these debts through a Chapter 13 repayment plan. The first part of the means test determines whether your current monthly income is less than your state’s median income for a household of your size.
If your family’s income is less than your state’s median income for a family of your size, you PASS the means test. There is no other testing and you can proceed with a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The current state median income figures can be found at the U.S. Trustee’s website: http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/meanstesting.htm.
If your family’s income is more than your state’s median income, you must complete the means test worksheet to calculate if you have (or should have) money to repay unsecured creditors. In the end if you are able to pay a significant portion of your unsecured debt, you will FAIL the means test and cannot file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
The truth is that most debtors pass the means test without any difficulty based upon their income. Others pass the means test after a skilled bankruptcy attorney has examined your income sources and made certain elections in completing the calculation. That is not to say that the test can be manipulated! On the contrary, the skilled bankruptcy attorney will work within the bankruptcy statutes, rules, case law, and local interpretations (which can vary a great deal among jurisdictions!) to obtain the best result from the means test.
If you have questions or concerns about passing the means test, seek out competent legal advice. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can guide you through the means test to reach the best possible result for your circumstances.
The bankruptcy means test is a calculation designed to identify debtors who can afford to pay some of their unsecured debts (for instance, credit card debt) and encourage repayment of these debts through a Chapter 13 repayment plan. The first part of the means test determines whether your current monthly income is less than your state’s median income for a household of your size.
If your family’s income is less than your state’s median income for a family of your size, you PASS the means test. There is no other testing and you can proceed with a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The current state median income figures can be found at the U.S. Trustee’s website: http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/meanstesting.htm.
If your family’s income is more than your state’s median income, you must complete the means test worksheet to calculate if you have (or should have) money to repay unsecured creditors. In the end if you are able to pay a significant portion of your unsecured debt, you will FAIL the means test and cannot file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
The truth is that most debtors pass the means test without any difficulty based upon their income. Others pass the means test after a skilled bankruptcy attorney has examined your income sources and made certain elections in completing the calculation. That is not to say that the test can be manipulated! On the contrary, the skilled bankruptcy attorney will work within the bankruptcy statutes, rules, case law, and local interpretations (which can vary a great deal among jurisdictions!) to obtain the best result from the means test.
If you have questions or concerns about passing the means test, seek out competent legal advice. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can guide you through the means test to reach the best possible result for your circumstances.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Auto Redemption in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Auto Redemption in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
During a Chapter 7 bankruptcy all unsecured debts are discharged. Debts that are secured by collateral (e.g. car loans) must be paid or the collateral must be returned to the lender. Occasionally an individual considering Chapter 7 bankruptcy will own a vehicle that is worth less than what is owed. This situation is often referred to as “upside down” and usually involves a late model vehicle that has depreciated faster than the person has paid on the loan. It doesn’t make any sense to pay for something that is “upside down,” but often an individual needs to keep the vehicle for transportation to work and for family use.
Fortunately, a provision of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy code allows an individual to keep a vehicle and pay only its current market value. This process is called “redemption.” During a redemption the value of the vehicle is determined (either by agreement between the debtor and creditor or by the bankruptcy judge after a hearing) and a court order is issued directing the creditor to accept a sum from the debtor in exchange for a release of its lien. In plain terms the lender is paid a lump sum and the lien on the vehicle is released. For example, a debtor that owes $15,000 on an auto that is worth $10,000 will only pay $10,000.
Unfortunately, the payment must be made in a one-time lump sum to the lender at the time of the redemption order. If the debtor is unable to pay for the vehicle, there are finance companies that make redemption loans for debtors in bankruptcy. Before making a redemption loan these finance companies require a loan application and certain assurances of repayment. The interest rate can be high for a redemption loan, however the resulting monthly payment is often lower than the original payment. It is important to carefully consider all of the advantages and disadvantages before making a decision to redeem a vehicle:
Advantages of a redemption loan:
• Retention of the vehicle;
• Vehicle is no longer “upside down;”
• The creditor cannot repossess the vehicle;
• Usually results in a lower monthly payment.
Disadvantages of a redemption loan:
• High interest rate.
Redemption is not the only option for keeping a vehicle after a bankruptcy. A skilled bankruptcy attorney can explain all of your options and help you obtain the best deal for your family.
During a Chapter 7 bankruptcy all unsecured debts are discharged. Debts that are secured by collateral (e.g. car loans) must be paid or the collateral must be returned to the lender. Occasionally an individual considering Chapter 7 bankruptcy will own a vehicle that is worth less than what is owed. This situation is often referred to as “upside down” and usually involves a late model vehicle that has depreciated faster than the person has paid on the loan. It doesn’t make any sense to pay for something that is “upside down,” but often an individual needs to keep the vehicle for transportation to work and for family use.
Fortunately, a provision of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy code allows an individual to keep a vehicle and pay only its current market value. This process is called “redemption.” During a redemption the value of the vehicle is determined (either by agreement between the debtor and creditor or by the bankruptcy judge after a hearing) and a court order is issued directing the creditor to accept a sum from the debtor in exchange for a release of its lien. In plain terms the lender is paid a lump sum and the lien on the vehicle is released. For example, a debtor that owes $15,000 on an auto that is worth $10,000 will only pay $10,000.
Unfortunately, the payment must be made in a one-time lump sum to the lender at the time of the redemption order. If the debtor is unable to pay for the vehicle, there are finance companies that make redemption loans for debtors in bankruptcy. Before making a redemption loan these finance companies require a loan application and certain assurances of repayment. The interest rate can be high for a redemption loan, however the resulting monthly payment is often lower than the original payment. It is important to carefully consider all of the advantages and disadvantages before making a decision to redeem a vehicle:
Advantages of a redemption loan:
• Retention of the vehicle;
• Vehicle is no longer “upside down;”
• The creditor cannot repossess the vehicle;
• Usually results in a lower monthly payment.
Disadvantages of a redemption loan:
• High interest rate.
Redemption is not the only option for keeping a vehicle after a bankruptcy. A skilled bankruptcy attorney can explain all of your options and help you obtain the best deal for your family.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Declaring Bankruptcy the Right Way
In an episode of television’s “The Office,” the main character Michael Scott makes a misguided attempt to resolve his debt problems by publicly stating, “I. . . declare. . . bankruptcy!” Video clips of this funny episode can be found on YouTube.
Back in the real world, declaring bankruptcy is not nearly as public, or as simple, as shouting out “I declare bankruptcy!” The bankruptcy process begins with an accounting of your income, expenses, assets, and debts. The debtor is required to use approved forms for this financial accounting. A copy of these forms can be found on the U.S. Courts website, and a general description of each form that must be filed in all consumer debtor Chapter 7 bankruptcy and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases is provided below.
The Voluntary Petition is three pages long and is the formal declaration of bankruptcy. Filing the Voluntary Petition begins the bankruptcy process and imposes the automatic stay which will generally stop action by creditors to collect debts.
Schedule A is a list of real property.
Schedule B is a list of personal property.
Schedule C is a list of property the debtor claims as exempt.
Schedule D is a list of creditors holding secured claims.
Schedule E is a list of creditors holding unsecured priority claims.
Schedule F is a list of creditors holding unsecured nonpriority claims.
Schedule G is a list of the debtor’s executory contracts and unexpired leases.
Schedule H is a list of codebtors in the bankruptcy.
Schedule I lists the debtor’s monthly income.
Schedule J lists the debtor’s monthly expenses.
The debtor must sign a Declaration that the above schedules are accurate to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief.
The debtor must file a Statement of Financial Affairs. This form provides a summary of the debtor's financial history, transactions, and operations over certain time periods before the case is filed. There are 18 separate items on this form:
- Income from Employment or Operation of Business
- Income Other than from Employment or Operation of Business
- Payments to Creditors
- Suits, Administrative Proceedings, Executions, Garnishments, and Attachments
- Repossessions, Foreclosures, and Returns
- Assignments and Receiverships
- Gifts
- Losses
- Payments Related to Debt Counseling or Bankruptcy
- Other Transfers
- Closed Financial Accounts
- Safe Deposit Boxes
- Setoffs
- Property Held for Another Person
- Prior Address of Debtor
- Spouses and Former Spouses
- Environmental Information
- Nature, Location, and Name of Business
Finally, the debtor must file either a Statement of Current Monthly Income and Means Test Calculation in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case, or a Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case.
The success of your bankruptcy largely depends on the accuracy of these forms and the skill that your bankruptcy attorney applies in crafting these financial reports. Don’t leave your financial future to chance! Seek out an experienced bankruptcy attorney to complete these forms and advise you on the best course of action to resolve your financial problems and protect your rights!
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Meeting Your Bankruptcy Attorney
Meeting Your Bankruptcy Attorney
Many clients are intimidated when meeting a bankruptcy attorney for the first time. They fear that they will be asked judgmental questions and have to justify their financial distress. They fear that they will not be able to answer the attorney’s questions and somehow not qualify for bankruptcy and the debt relief they desperately need.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The first thing you will discover when meeting your bankruptcy attorney is that your attorney is a good listener. You are the world’s foremost expert concerning your own finances, and your attorney is there to learn about your case from you.
The second thing you will discover is your attorney’s compassion. Bankruptcy attorneys really do care about their clients. Bankruptcy is one of the few areas of the law where the legal process is designed to have a positive result for the client. The goal of your bankruptcy attorney is to ensure that you are in a better financial position at the end of the case than you were at the beginning. Bankruptcy lawyers are caring individuals that have an active interest in your future success.
The third thing you will notice is how your attorney is able to quickly summarize what seems like an overwhelming problem into simple concepts. Your attorney will break down your finances into four categories: assets, debts, income, and expenses. From there you and your attorney can discuss what must be done to improve your financial situation.
Finally, you will be impressed with the clarity your attorney has for repairing your financial problem. A skilled bankruptcy attorney spends years studying, training, and gaining practical experience just so your case can be resolved quickly and efficiently. Bankruptcy law is all about paths to recovery and your attorney will guide you along a path that is best for you.
When you first meet your bankruptcy attorney, discuss your case openly and honestly. You will find that your attorney is dedicated to helping you attain a financial fresh start and improve your family’s finances.
Many clients are intimidated when meeting a bankruptcy attorney for the first time. They fear that they will be asked judgmental questions and have to justify their financial distress. They fear that they will not be able to answer the attorney’s questions and somehow not qualify for bankruptcy and the debt relief they desperately need.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The first thing you will discover when meeting your bankruptcy attorney is that your attorney is a good listener. You are the world’s foremost expert concerning your own finances, and your attorney is there to learn about your case from you.
The second thing you will discover is your attorney’s compassion. Bankruptcy attorneys really do care about their clients. Bankruptcy is one of the few areas of the law where the legal process is designed to have a positive result for the client. The goal of your bankruptcy attorney is to ensure that you are in a better financial position at the end of the case than you were at the beginning. Bankruptcy lawyers are caring individuals that have an active interest in your future success.
The third thing you will notice is how your attorney is able to quickly summarize what seems like an overwhelming problem into simple concepts. Your attorney will break down your finances into four categories: assets, debts, income, and expenses. From there you and your attorney can discuss what must be done to improve your financial situation.
Finally, you will be impressed with the clarity your attorney has for repairing your financial problem. A skilled bankruptcy attorney spends years studying, training, and gaining practical experience just so your case can be resolved quickly and efficiently. Bankruptcy law is all about paths to recovery and your attorney will guide you along a path that is best for you.
When you first meet your bankruptcy attorney, discuss your case openly and honestly. You will find that your attorney is dedicated to helping you attain a financial fresh start and improve your family’s finances.
“At Risk” Property During Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
“At Risk” Property During Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is generally a numbers game between the bankruptcy trustee and the debtor. The trustee seeks to liquidate the debtor's non-exempt assets to pay creditors, and the debtor tries to avoid liquidation of any property. When property is identified by the trustee as non-exempt, the trustee may ask the debtor to turn over the property (or its cash equivalent). The trustee will then liquidate the property and distribute the proceeds to creditors.
The United States Trustee Program reports only around four percent of all Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases are “asset cases.” In other words, statistically only one case in twenty-five has an asset that can be converted to cash and distributed to creditors. Some common types of non-exempt assets include:
• Cash money
• Tax refund
• Vehicle equity
• Home equity
• Misidentified financial account
• Unlisted property
Whenever a non-exempt asset is found by the bankruptcy trustee, the debtor’s case comes under greater scrutiny, the case is generally prolonged while the asset is administered, and creditors are invited to file proof of claims to participate in the distribution of the asset.
The key to keeping property during a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is early identification and full disclosure with your bankruptcy attorney. Poor communication between the client and attorney is usually the cause of “at risk” property. Every bankruptcy attorney has a story about a client who informs the trustee at the 341 meeting of creditors, “I didn’t tell my attorney about this property, but. . .” This story seldom has a happy ending for the client and usually results in the loss of that property.
There are many ways to protect property during a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Be sure to discuss all of your assets with your bankruptcy attorney. If you have doubts whether you have an ownership interest in property, discuss it with your bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can provide you legal options to protect your assets and avoid “at risk” property during the bankruptcy process.
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is generally a numbers game between the bankruptcy trustee and the debtor. The trustee seeks to liquidate the debtor's non-exempt assets to pay creditors, and the debtor tries to avoid liquidation of any property. When property is identified by the trustee as non-exempt, the trustee may ask the debtor to turn over the property (or its cash equivalent). The trustee will then liquidate the property and distribute the proceeds to creditors.
The United States Trustee Program reports only around four percent of all Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases are “asset cases.” In other words, statistically only one case in twenty-five has an asset that can be converted to cash and distributed to creditors. Some common types of non-exempt assets include:
• Cash money
• Tax refund
• Vehicle equity
• Home equity
• Misidentified financial account
• Unlisted property
Whenever a non-exempt asset is found by the bankruptcy trustee, the debtor’s case comes under greater scrutiny, the case is generally prolonged while the asset is administered, and creditors are invited to file proof of claims to participate in the distribution of the asset.
The key to keeping property during a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is early identification and full disclosure with your bankruptcy attorney. Poor communication between the client and attorney is usually the cause of “at risk” property. Every bankruptcy attorney has a story about a client who informs the trustee at the 341 meeting of creditors, “I didn’t tell my attorney about this property, but. . .” This story seldom has a happy ending for the client and usually results in the loss of that property.
There are many ways to protect property during a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Be sure to discuss all of your assets with your bankruptcy attorney. If you have doubts whether you have an ownership interest in property, discuss it with your bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can provide you legal options to protect your assets and avoid “at risk” property during the bankruptcy process.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Statement of Intention – Bankruptcy Code as it relates to Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
The Bankruptcy Code directs the Chapter 7 debtor to file a statement of intention with the bankruptcy court within 30 days after the petition filing, or on or before the 341 Meeting of Creditors, whichever is earlier. A statement of intention advises the court, the bankruptcy trustee, and your creditors of how the debtor intends to treat secured collateral, like a car or home, in the bankruptcy.
The Bankruptcy Code also requires that the Chapter 7 debtor perform on that intention within 45 days after filing the statement. The Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to choose one of the following: (1) surrender the collateral back to the creditor and discharge any personal liability; (2) reaffirm the debt and retain the collateral in exchange for continued personal liability on the original debt; or (3) redeem the collateral by paying the current fair market value in a lump sum.
Prior to the overhaul of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, a Chapter 7 statement of intention had little relevance. Now the statement of intention can mean the difference between keeping and losing an automobile or other secured property.
Failure to timely file or perform on a statement of intention causes the automatic stay to be lifted and the property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy case. In some cases, a purchase agreement may contain an ipso facto clause which creates a default on the loan by filing bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code expressly nullifies ipso facto clauses, but only for property of the bankruptcy estate. Most courts find that ipso facto clauses are enforceable under state law when property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy estate.
Let me restate this situation in plain English: if you file bankruptcy and do not file or timely perform on a statement of intention, the property is no longer protected by the bankruptcy and can be repossessed by the creditor, even though you are current on the loan. This situation recently was discussed in a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case, Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company.
If you have an auto loan or other secured item you want to keep, discuss your options with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can help you reach the right decision for you and your family.
The Bankruptcy Code also requires that the Chapter 7 debtor perform on that intention within 45 days after filing the statement. The Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to choose one of the following: (1) surrender the collateral back to the creditor and discharge any personal liability; (2) reaffirm the debt and retain the collateral in exchange for continued personal liability on the original debt; or (3) redeem the collateral by paying the current fair market value in a lump sum.
Prior to the overhaul of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, a Chapter 7 statement of intention had little relevance. Now the statement of intention can mean the difference between keeping and losing an automobile or other secured property.
Failure to timely file or perform on a statement of intention causes the automatic stay to be lifted and the property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy case. In some cases, a purchase agreement may contain an ipso facto clause which creates a default on the loan by filing bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code expressly nullifies ipso facto clauses, but only for property of the bankruptcy estate. Most courts find that ipso facto clauses are enforceable under state law when property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy estate.
Let me restate this situation in plain English: if you file bankruptcy and do not file or timely perform on a statement of intention, the property is no longer protected by the bankruptcy and can be repossessed by the creditor, even though you are current on the loan. This situation recently was discussed in a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case, Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company.
If you have an auto loan or other secured item you want to keep, discuss your options with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. Your attorney can help you reach the right decision for you and your family.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)