How Often Can I File Bankruptcy?
Filing bankruptcy is a difficult decision, but sometimes life dictates choices to us. Financial disaster can blind-side any of us, like a job loss or medical catastrophe. Whatever the reason, individuals occasionally need the protections of the federal bankruptcy laws a second time.
An individual can ordinarily file a bankruptcy case at anytime, however there may be restrictions on the relief that is available. The most common restriction is the eligibility to receive a bankruptcy discharge. To receive a Chapter 7 discharge, you must file your case eight (8) years after your previous Chapter 7 case was filed, or six (6) years after your Chapter 13 case was filed. To receive a Chapter 13 discharge, you must file your case four (4) years after your previous Chapter 7 case was filed, or two (2) years after your Chapter 13 case was filed.
In some cases, receiving a bankruptcy discharge may not be important to the debtor. For instance, if a debtor has a non-dischargeable debt like child support or taxes that must be paid, bankruptcy can offer an organized process for payment while the debtor retains some control.
Another less common restriction concerns the automatic stay. If your bankruptcy case is dismissed within the past year, the bankruptcy court assumes that your second bankruptcy is filed in bad faith. The automatic stay will only apply for 30 days after your second filing. A hearing is required to extend the automatic stay and you must convince the court that you have filed in “good faith.” If you file two or more cases within the past years, you must petition the bankruptcy court for a stay – it is not automatic for any period of time.
Finally, you are not eligible to file at all if your case was dismissed by the bankruptcy court within 180 days due to a willful failure to obey an order of the bankruptcy court, or if your case was voluntarily dismissed after a creditor sought to lift the automatic stay to enforce a lien against your property.
Filing a second bankruptcy is not uncommon. Congress has established a few additional rules to deter abusive serial filers, but bankruptcy protection is available for the honest yet unfortunate debtor. If you need assistance with filing a second bankruptcy case, contact an experienced bankruptcy attorney and get the relief you need.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Making Your First Chapter 13 Payment
Making Your First Chapter 13 Payment
In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case the debtor proposes a plan to pay back creditors. That plan is composed of monthly payments to satisfy all or part of the creditors' claims over three to five years. Monthly payments are made to the Chapter 13 Trustee, who then pays your creditors.
There is often confusion over when the first plan payment due. Section 1326 of the Bankruptcy Code directs that the first payment must be made within 30 days after filing the bankruptcy case, even if the debtor’s bankruptcy plan has not yet been approved by the court. Often the first meeting with the Trustee (also known as the "341 meeting" or "meeting of creditors") is scheduled more than 30 days after the filing date, so the Trustee expects your first payment before that meeting. The Trustee will hold all payments until the plan is approved by the Bankruptcy Court (called "confirmation"), and then make distributions to creditors.
It is critical that you make this initial payment within thirty days after filing. It is especially important to monitor the status of this first payment when you have instructed your employer to pay the Trustee from your wages. It is your responsibility to ensure that this first payment is made, and neither the Trustee nor the Bankruptcy Court gives much latitude to a debtor who misses the first deadline in the case.
Making a timely first Chapter 13 payment allows your plan to proceed to confirmation and will expedite the bankruptcy process. Failure to commence making payments can result in delays, additional expenses, or even dismissal. Consult with your bankruptcy attorney regarding payment details, and make that first payment on-time!
In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case the debtor proposes a plan to pay back creditors. That plan is composed of monthly payments to satisfy all or part of the creditors' claims over three to five years. Monthly payments are made to the Chapter 13 Trustee, who then pays your creditors.
There is often confusion over when the first plan payment due. Section 1326 of the Bankruptcy Code directs that the first payment must be made within 30 days after filing the bankruptcy case, even if the debtor’s bankruptcy plan has not yet been approved by the court. Often the first meeting with the Trustee (also known as the "341 meeting" or "meeting of creditors") is scheduled more than 30 days after the filing date, so the Trustee expects your first payment before that meeting. The Trustee will hold all payments until the plan is approved by the Bankruptcy Court (called "confirmation"), and then make distributions to creditors.
It is critical that you make this initial payment within thirty days after filing. It is especially important to monitor the status of this first payment when you have instructed your employer to pay the Trustee from your wages. It is your responsibility to ensure that this first payment is made, and neither the Trustee nor the Bankruptcy Court gives much latitude to a debtor who misses the first deadline in the case.
Making a timely first Chapter 13 payment allows your plan to proceed to confirmation and will expedite the bankruptcy process. Failure to commence making payments can result in delays, additional expenses, or even dismissal. Consult with your bankruptcy attorney regarding payment details, and make that first payment on-time!
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Bankruptcy Cases Per Capita
Bankruptcy Cases Per Capita
Nevada, Tennessee, and Georgia are the highest per capita states for bankruptcy filings according recently released data concerning the first quarter of 2010. Records from the Automated Access to Court Electronic Records show there were 378,990 total bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2010, up from 325,815 in the first quarter of 2009.
In Nevada residents filed 10.3 bankruptcies per 1,000 residents for the first quarter of 2010. Tennessee and Georgia filed 8.0 and 7.8 respectively. Alaska is the state with the lowest per capita filing with 1.5 filings per 1,000 residents. According to these statistics the average Nevadan is almost seven times more likely to file bankruptcy than the average Alaskan.
Below is a list of the state’s bankruptcy filings per capita:
1. Nevada 10.3
2. Tennessee 8.0
3. Georgia 7.8
4. Michigan 7.4
5. Alabama 7.1
6. Indiana 7.0
7. California 6.4
8. Illinois 6.4
9. Kentucky 6.1
10. Ohio 5.9
11. Colorado 5.9
12. Utah 5.8
13. Arizona 5.6
14. Arkansas 5.6
15. Florida 5.6
16. Wisconsin 5.3
17. Rhode Island 5.2
18. Missouri 5.1
19. Delaware 5.1
20. Mississippi 5.0
21. Maryland 5.0
22. Washington 4.9
23. Oregon 4.8
24. Virginia 4.7
25. New Jersey 4.5
26. New Hampshire 4.5
27. Idaho 4.4
28. Nebraska 4.3
29. Minnesota 4.2
30. Louisiana 3.9
31. Oklahoma 3.8
32. West Virginia 3.7
33. Kansas 3.6
34. Massachusetts 3.5
35. New Mexico 3.3
36. Iowa 3.3
37. Connecticut 3.2
38. Pennsylvania 3.0
39. Maine 2.9
40. Vermont 2.9
41. Hawaii 2.9
42. North Carolina 2.8
43. Montana 2.7
44. New York 2.7
45. Wyoming 2.5
46. Texas 2.2
47. South Dakota 2.2
48. North Dakota 2.2
49. District of Columbia 2.1
50. South Carolina 2.1
51. Alaska 1.5
If you are considering a personal bankruptcy, you are not alone! In this tough economy, many families file bankruptcy to relieve them from the pressures of overwhelming debt and to begin their fresh start to a brighter financial future. Have your case evaluated today from an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you.
Nevada, Tennessee, and Georgia are the highest per capita states for bankruptcy filings according recently released data concerning the first quarter of 2010. Records from the Automated Access to Court Electronic Records show there were 378,990 total bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2010, up from 325,815 in the first quarter of 2009.
In Nevada residents filed 10.3 bankruptcies per 1,000 residents for the first quarter of 2010. Tennessee and Georgia filed 8.0 and 7.8 respectively. Alaska is the state with the lowest per capita filing with 1.5 filings per 1,000 residents. According to these statistics the average Nevadan is almost seven times more likely to file bankruptcy than the average Alaskan.
Below is a list of the state’s bankruptcy filings per capita:
1. Nevada 10.3
2. Tennessee 8.0
3. Georgia 7.8
4. Michigan 7.4
5. Alabama 7.1
6. Indiana 7.0
7. California 6.4
8. Illinois 6.4
9. Kentucky 6.1
10. Ohio 5.9
11. Colorado 5.9
12. Utah 5.8
13. Arizona 5.6
14. Arkansas 5.6
15. Florida 5.6
16. Wisconsin 5.3
17. Rhode Island 5.2
18. Missouri 5.1
19. Delaware 5.1
20. Mississippi 5.0
21. Maryland 5.0
22. Washington 4.9
23. Oregon 4.8
24. Virginia 4.7
25. New Jersey 4.5
26. New Hampshire 4.5
27. Idaho 4.4
28. Nebraska 4.3
29. Minnesota 4.2
30. Louisiana 3.9
31. Oklahoma 3.8
32. West Virginia 3.7
33. Kansas 3.6
34. Massachusetts 3.5
35. New Mexico 3.3
36. Iowa 3.3
37. Connecticut 3.2
38. Pennsylvania 3.0
39. Maine 2.9
40. Vermont 2.9
41. Hawaii 2.9
42. North Carolina 2.8
43. Montana 2.7
44. New York 2.7
45. Wyoming 2.5
46. Texas 2.2
47. South Dakota 2.2
48. North Dakota 2.2
49. District of Columbia 2.1
50. South Carolina 2.1
51. Alaska 1.5
If you are considering a personal bankruptcy, you are not alone! In this tough economy, many families file bankruptcy to relieve them from the pressures of overwhelming debt and to begin their fresh start to a brighter financial future. Have your case evaluated today from an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you.
Credit Card Defendant Wins Lawsuit, Collects $120,000
Credit Card Defendant Wins Lawsuit, Collects $120,000
Most of the debt collection industry is based on bully tactics. Each stage of the collection process is designed to intimidate and harass until the individual simply surrenders and pays the debt. Collectors send embarrassing letters in pink envelopes marked “URGENT!” or “IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED!” They make scores of phone calls at home and work, until you are afraid to pick up your own phone.
Even when there is a valid defense, a credit card company will sometimes seek to bury the defendant with the enormity of its size. Take for example the recent Palm Beach County, Florida, case of Capital One Bank USA, NA v Pincus. Capital One sued Steven Pincus for a credit card debt of $803.95. Pincus offered to settle the debt for a few hundred dollars, and Capital One refused. Pincus then hired an attorney to defend. Capital One responded with a barrage of court filings that ran up Pincus’s legal expense tab to over $100,000.
Pincus moved for summary judgment and dismissal claiming the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations. Pincus asserted that the Capital One cardholder agreement states that Virginia law shall control, and, since the contract was not signed by either party, whatever agreement existed between Pincus and Capital One must be an oral contract. Pincus further argued that since the statute of limitations for oral contracts in Virginia is three years and since Capital One’s lawsuit was filed three and a half years after the date of the last transaction, Capital One’s case is time barred. Capital One defended by arguing that Florida law and its five year statute of limitations should control because Florida was the state where the contract was made.
The Palm Beach County Court found that Virginia law controlled and the credit card agreement was an oral contract based on Virginia law. The opinion cited several similar Florida cases finding the choice of law provision in a cardholder agreement applies to a statute of limitations defense. In granting Pincus’s summary judgment motion and dismissing the case, the Florida court opinion said the credit card company is “‘master of its complaint’ and cannot disavow the choice of law provision contained in the document it attaches to its Complaint so it can take advantage of the longer statute of limitations.”
The Pincus case did not end there. Pincus and his attorney filed a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit in federal court against Capital One’s attorneys to recover his attorney fees (Capital One, as an original creditor, is exempt from the FDCPA, but collection attorneys are not). The case was settled after contentious litigation for $120,000.
The moral of the story is “Don’t be bullied!” If you are sued for a credit card debt, seek legal advice from an experienced debt defense attorney. Many bankruptcy attorneys are experts in debt defense and can explain your legal options.
Most of the debt collection industry is based on bully tactics. Each stage of the collection process is designed to intimidate and harass until the individual simply surrenders and pays the debt. Collectors send embarrassing letters in pink envelopes marked “URGENT!” or “IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED!” They make scores of phone calls at home and work, until you are afraid to pick up your own phone.
Even when there is a valid defense, a credit card company will sometimes seek to bury the defendant with the enormity of its size. Take for example the recent Palm Beach County, Florida, case of Capital One Bank USA, NA v Pincus. Capital One sued Steven Pincus for a credit card debt of $803.95. Pincus offered to settle the debt for a few hundred dollars, and Capital One refused. Pincus then hired an attorney to defend. Capital One responded with a barrage of court filings that ran up Pincus’s legal expense tab to over $100,000.
Pincus moved for summary judgment and dismissal claiming the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations. Pincus asserted that the Capital One cardholder agreement states that Virginia law shall control, and, since the contract was not signed by either party, whatever agreement existed between Pincus and Capital One must be an oral contract. Pincus further argued that since the statute of limitations for oral contracts in Virginia is three years and since Capital One’s lawsuit was filed three and a half years after the date of the last transaction, Capital One’s case is time barred. Capital One defended by arguing that Florida law and its five year statute of limitations should control because Florida was the state where the contract was made.
The Palm Beach County Court found that Virginia law controlled and the credit card agreement was an oral contract based on Virginia law. The opinion cited several similar Florida cases finding the choice of law provision in a cardholder agreement applies to a statute of limitations defense. In granting Pincus’s summary judgment motion and dismissing the case, the Florida court opinion said the credit card company is “‘master of its complaint’ and cannot disavow the choice of law provision contained in the document it attaches to its Complaint so it can take advantage of the longer statute of limitations.”
The Pincus case did not end there. Pincus and his attorney filed a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit in federal court against Capital One’s attorneys to recover his attorney fees (Capital One, as an original creditor, is exempt from the FDCPA, but collection attorneys are not). The case was settled after contentious litigation for $120,000.
The moral of the story is “Don’t be bullied!” If you are sued for a credit card debt, seek legal advice from an experienced debt defense attorney. Many bankruptcy attorneys are experts in debt defense and can explain your legal options.
Can I Keep My House If I File Bankruptcy
Can I Keep My House If I File Bankruptcy
One of the most common and important questions asked by a client during the initial bankruptcy consultation is, “Can I keep my house?”
The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experienced attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.
The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.
The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.
In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.
Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.
There are many options available for saving your home. Your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.
One of the most common and important questions asked by a client during the initial bankruptcy consultation is, “Can I keep my house?”
The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experienced attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.
The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.
The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.
In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.
Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.
There are many options available for saving your home. Your bankruptcy attorney can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.
Discharged Creditor Responsible for Selling Debt
Discharged Creditor Responsible for Selling Debt
A bankruptcy discharge is a permanent court injunction prohibiting creditors from enforcing certain obligations against the debtor. While the bankruptcy discharge does not actually “erase” a debt, it prohibits any collection against the debtor personally. In plain terms, the debt is no longer legally enforceable against the debtor and the creditor can no longer engage in any type of collection activity such as; letters, phone calls, threats of criminal proceedings or other adverse actions brought about with the purpose of debt repayment.
The purpose of the discharge injunction is to provide the debtor with a fresh financial start, free of the pressures of former debt. Violation of the bankruptcy discharge is a serious matter. A willful violation of the discharge injunction constitutes contempt of court. The violator (often called the “contemnor”) may be penalized for this conduct, including a hefty fine and payment of attorney fees.
Recently United States Bankruptcy Court Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte discussed the liability of a creditor that sold a discharged debt and the subsequent purchaser attempted collection action. This is practice is often referred to as “zombie” debt collection. The debt is legally “dead,” and the collector attempts to “bring it back to life” through direct collection efforts.
In the case of Laboy v. FirstBank Puerto Rico, Judge Lomoutte reminds creditors that they "are obligated to maintain procedures to ensure that they do not violate [the discharge injunction], and may be held liable for damages and attorney's fees if they do not.” He concluded that FirstBank had knowledge of the bankruptcy filing and discharge and that its actions in selling the debt to a debt collector some 15 years after the bankruptcy discharge violated the discharge injunction.
If you receive contact from a debt collector concerning a discharged debt, notify your bankruptcy attorney immediately. This may be an innocent error, or it may be a zombie debt collector on the prowl. Either way, you should contact your bankruptcy attorney and chase these zombies debts back to the grave!
A bankruptcy discharge is a permanent court injunction prohibiting creditors from enforcing certain obligations against the debtor. While the bankruptcy discharge does not actually “erase” a debt, it prohibits any collection against the debtor personally. In plain terms, the debt is no longer legally enforceable against the debtor and the creditor can no longer engage in any type of collection activity such as; letters, phone calls, threats of criminal proceedings or other adverse actions brought about with the purpose of debt repayment.
The purpose of the discharge injunction is to provide the debtor with a fresh financial start, free of the pressures of former debt. Violation of the bankruptcy discharge is a serious matter. A willful violation of the discharge injunction constitutes contempt of court. The violator (often called the “contemnor”) may be penalized for this conduct, including a hefty fine and payment of attorney fees.
Recently United States Bankruptcy Court Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte discussed the liability of a creditor that sold a discharged debt and the subsequent purchaser attempted collection action. This is practice is often referred to as “zombie” debt collection. The debt is legally “dead,” and the collector attempts to “bring it back to life” through direct collection efforts.
In the case of Laboy v. FirstBank Puerto Rico, Judge Lomoutte reminds creditors that they "are obligated to maintain procedures to ensure that they do not violate [the discharge injunction], and may be held liable for damages and attorney's fees if they do not.” He concluded that FirstBank had knowledge of the bankruptcy filing and discharge and that its actions in selling the debt to a debt collector some 15 years after the bankruptcy discharge violated the discharge injunction.
If you receive contact from a debt collector concerning a discharged debt, notify your bankruptcy attorney immediately. This may be an innocent error, or it may be a zombie debt collector on the prowl. Either way, you should contact your bankruptcy attorney and chase these zombies debts back to the grave!
Monday, May 24, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)